Statistical classification of item-response patterns into misconception groups in rule space
Kim, Sung-Hoon
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/19140
Description
Title
Statistical classification of item-response patterns into misconception groups in rule space
Author(s)
Kim, Sung-Hoon
Issue Date
1990
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Wardrop, James L.
Department of Study
Education, Tests and Measurements
Discipline
Education, Tests and Measurements
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Education, Tests and Measurements
Language
eng
Abstract
In an effort to further explore a specific aspect of rule-space theory, identification of students with respect to their error rules, three major questions were raised: (a) How do the discriminant-function approach (DA) and the k-nearest-neighbor approach (KNN) perform for the classification of each bivariate-normally- and non-bivariate-normally-distributed item-response patterns in rule space? (b) Is the use of rule-space model better than not using it for classifications? (c) What is the minimum pairwise distance for a 90% correct classification?
A Monte Carlo study was executed. Two independent and identical sample sets of item-response patterns were simulated. For each sample, two hundred item-response patterns in each rule group, for a total of fifteen groups, were generated. However, only the item-response patterns of nine rule groups located near the 0 axis were used for classifications. The excluded item-response patterns were of the groups that regressed steeply from extreme ZETA toward ZETA = 0. An optimum k = 9 was chosen for KNN. Three kinds of error rates--leave-one-out error rate (Ecv), apparent error rate (App), and error rate using separate sample groups (Ess)--were used for the hypothesis tests.
Major findings were: (a) DA was robust against non-bivariate-normality over the ability continuum for classification in rule space. (b) The use of rule-space variables as classification variables was proved to be more reliable than the use of item scores. (c) The minimum pairwise distance for 90% correct classifications was given by rather a large interval between 3.57 and 14.06.
Discussions were given in relation with the regression of sample distributions, an optimum k for KNN, and the three major findings. Based on the discussions, correction of the regression, generalization studies for the robustness of DA, unsupervised classification, classification of the observations into merged groups were suggested for further studies.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.