Markedness and instructed SLA: An experiment in teaching the Spanish subjunctive
Pereira, Isabel
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/19123
Description
Title
Markedness and instructed SLA: An experiment in teaching the Spanish subjunctive
Author(s)
Pereira, Isabel
Issue Date
1996
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
VanPatten, Bill
Department of Study
Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese
Discipline
Spanish
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Education, Language and Literature
Language, Linguistics
Education, Curriculum and Instruction
Language
eng
Abstract
The present study has investigated the role of typological markedness on instructed second language acquisition (SLA). In particular, the study has examined whether instruction in a marked Spanish subjunctive use had an effect on the acquisition of this marked element and triggered the acquisition of unmarked subjunctive uses. For the purpose of the study, the instructional method used was processing instruction.
A typological hierarchy of subjunctive uses was investigated based on the typological and acquisitional literature. This study was focused on six subjunctive categories: VOL, PUR $>$ POSS, TEMP, EVAL $>$ CONC (volition, purpuse, temportal-anticipation, possibility, evaluation and concession). Based on previous research, it was hypothesized that processing instruction limited to a marked present subjunctive use--evaluation use--had a positive impact on learners' acquisition of this marked element and the effect of learning was generalized to the unmarked subjunctive uses--volition and purpose categories.
Subjects (68) were divided into two groups: (l) the marked subjunctive treatment group, who was taught in a marked use of present subjunctive and (2) the control group, who did not receive any explicit instruction on the target subjunctive uses. The effect of instruction was measured on a battery of pre- and post-tests, in which subjects completed two types of written tasks: one Grammaticality Judgment task to measure learners' gain on their knowledge of subjunctive and one Dialogue Completion task to measure learners' gain on the production of subjunctive. The scoring of tests were submitted for statistical analysis.
The results of the statistical analyses for the Grammaticality Judgment test and the Dialogue Completion test did not show a significantly important difference between the experimental and the control groups. However, the present study found limited support for the hypothesis by looking at some descriptive statistical measures. The results thus of the analyses on the level of difficulty of the different subjunctive items have pointed towards supporting the hypothesis, although the instructional effect was small.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
