The Administrator Looks at Classification

Downs, Robert B.

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/1473 Copy

Description

Title

The Administrator Looks at Classification

Author(s)

Downs, Robert B.

Issue Date

1959

Keyword(s)

Classification --Books

Abstract

A strong case can be made out, I am convinced, for the proposition that many librarians are obsessed with classification for the sake of classification. With rare exceptions, investigation has revealed, library users are totally indifferent to classification, so long as it does not actually interfere with their finding the books they want. If they have thought about the matter at all and were given a choice, the readers would vote for the utmost possible simplicity in whatever scheme of classification is adopted. Logical sequences, a fetish worshipped by numerous classifiers, mean little to all except an occasional professor of philosophy. Though I would not argue for it, there is a good deal to be said for the accession order in arranging the books in a library simply numbering the first book received 1, the second 2, and so on ad infinitum, filling every shelf to capacity, and saving much space. Such a plan appears to have worked satisfactorily in the half-million volume library of the London School of Economics, but that is a closed shelf collection and perhaps belongs to a special category. Carrying the thesis further, I would maintain that librarians, principally in colleges and universities, have been guilty of wasting millions of dollars in elaborate and unnecessary reclassification programs, using funds that could have been spent to far greater advantage to everyone concerned in building up their book resources. To be specific, consider the cases of two of the most poverty-stricken university libraries in the country: The University of Mississippi and the University of South Carolina, both of which have expended tens of thousands of dollars in recent years, changing over from one standard system of classification to another. Meanwhile their book budgets were at about the level of a college library without any university pretensions. Here is almost incontrovertible support for such critics as Lawrence C. Powell, when they charge that librarians are more concerned with housekeeping than with books and reading.

Publisher

Graduate School of Library Science. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Series/Report Name or Number

Allerton Park Institute (6th : 1959)

ISSN

0536-4604

Type of Resource

text

Language

en

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/1473

Copyright and License Information

Copyright owned by Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. 1959.

Owning Collections