Technical Authorship: Refiguring the Designer-user Conflict and the Visioning of Collective Technical Futures
Cohn, Marisa Leavitt; Sim, Susan Elliott; Philip, Kavita
Loading…
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/15089
Description
Title
Technical Authorship: Refiguring the Designer-user Conflict and the Visioning of Collective Technical Futures
Author(s)
Cohn, Marisa Leavitt
Sim, Susan Elliott
Philip, Kavita
Issue Date
2008-02-28
Keyword(s)
Authorship
Science Studies
Design Methodologies
Figuration
Politics of Design
Abstract
This paper argues for the application of authorship analysis to technology design. It extends techniques used in Science Studies to investigate scientific authorship in order to define a concept of technical authorship. To illustrate the potential of this approach, authorship analysis is applied to particular prescriptive software design methodologies including Participatory Design and Agile Software Development. The results of this analysis are the recognition that: a) design methodologies are rhetorics of authorship, b) the designer-user relationship can be seen as a conflict of contested authorship, and c) this conflict can be seen within the tensions in the figuration of the user and the designer along a subject-object continuum. “Figuration,” a technique used by Donna Haraway, brings about a new understanding of the centrality of the user in the design process as well as the role of the designer as the contested author technical futures. The implications suggest that design researchers might use authorship as a new approach to the politics of design by re-figuring the designer and user rather than collapsing the distinction between these roles.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.