Withdraw
Loading…
Comparing two bony structures for aging lake trout from Lake Michigan
Stacy-Duffy, William L.; Czesny, Sergiusz J.
Loading…
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/124116
Description
- Title
- Comparing two bony structures for aging lake trout from Lake Michigan
- Author(s)
- Stacy-Duffy, William L.
- Czesny, Sergiusz J.
- Contributor(s)
- ,
- Issue Date
- 2024-09-12
- Keyword(s)
- Fisheries Management
- Population Metrics
- Lake Trout
- Lake Michigan
- Geographic Coverage
- Illinois
- Abstract
- The collection of accurate age data is a critical tool in fisheries management as it is essential for understanding population metrics such as growth (DeVries and Frie, 1996), maturity (Madenjian et al.,1998), population age structure (Burnham-Curtis and Bronte, 1996), and mortality (Sitar et al., 1999). Age data are also a critical input to statistical catch-at-age models (SCAA), an intensive tool used to assess fish stocks and forecast the population-level impact of management decisions (e.g Caroffino and Lenart, 2011; Ebener et al., 2021). Accurate age estimates are required for these tools to be useful to managers, especially for longer-lived fishes such as lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush). A dramatic increase in lake trout natural reproduction and recruitment has been observed in the Illinois waters of Lake Michigan in the past two decades (Patterson et al., 2016) after 40 years of stocking efforts failed to result in any meaningful successful spawning. All lake trout currently stocked in Lake Michigan are given a coded wire tag (CWT) containing a 6-digit code referring to their specific stocking event. Coded-wire tagging allows managers to collect precise age data to assess growth and mortality (e.g., Kornis et al., 2019; Clark et al., 2023) with complete certainty. As naturally reproduced lake trout increase in abundance, managers need reliable age structures that can be collected from surveyed wild fish to estimate population age structure, growth, and survival in the absence of CWT data. Quantifying these metrics for the wild population requires acquiring age data from bony structures, traditionally otoliths (Campana and Thorrold, 2001) which are often considered the most accurate hard structure for aging fish. However, otoliths can be rendered unreadable when their typical form of calcium carbonate, aragonite, is replaced by an alternative crystalline form known as vaterite (Bowen II et al., 1999). The presence of vateritic otoliths cause over one third of sampled fish to be excluded from analysis due to the lack of an age estimate (Osbourne et al., 2022). Recent research has shown the efficacy of maxillae for providing accurate ages for lake trout (Wellenkamp et al., 2015; Hemmelgarn et al., 2022). This led fishery managers with Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) to seek to understand the potential for maxillary bone sections to provide consistent and accurate ages, without being subject to the loss of data related to otoliths being unreadable. Existing fish with CWTs provide an opportunity to observe aging structures from known-age fish to validate aging procedures, an important step in age determination methods (Beamish and McFarlane, 1983). The objective of this study was to assess the utility of lake trout maxillae and otoliths for aging and subsequently provide recommendations to the IDNR as to the most effective structure to collect from lake trout in future surveys.
- Publisher
- Illinois Natural History Survey
- Series/Report Name or Number
- NHS Technical Report 2024 (16)
- Type of Resource
- text
- Language
- eng
- Sponsor(s)/Grant Number(s)
- Federal Aid Project F-196
- Copyright and License Information
- This document is a product of the Illinois Natural History Survey, and has been selected and made available by the Illinois Natural History Survey and the University Library, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. It is intended solely for noncommercial research and educational use, and proper attribution is requested.
Owning Collections
Technical Reports - Illinois Natural History Survey PRIMARY
Reports produced by INHS staff, usually as deliverables for assessment projects funded by federal or state agencies or non-governmental organizations.Manage Files
Loading…
Edit Collection Membership
Loading…
Edit Metadata
Loading…
Edit Properties
Loading…
Embargoes
Loading…