Is liquidity provision that informative? Evidence from commodity futures markets
Ma, Richie Ruchuan
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/117658
Description
Title
Is liquidity provision that informative? Evidence from commodity futures markets
Author(s)
Ma, Richie Ruchuan
Issue Date
2022-11-28
Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
Serra, Teresa
Committee Member(s)
Garcia, Philip
Irwin, Scott H
Department of Study
Agr & Consumer Economics
Discipline
Agricultural & Applied Econ
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
M.S.
Degree Level
Thesis
Keyword(s)
Liquidity provision
Market microstructure
Price discovery
Commodity futures markets
Limit orders
Abstract
Electronic trading allows traders to easily monitor markets and respond to changes in real time. This paper examines the dynamics of limit orders and their contribution to price discovery in CME corn, soybean, and wheat futures markets from January 2019 to June 2020. We find that 25% of limit orders submitted are filled, while around 70% are cancelled and 5% revised. Latency of order activity is low, with half of the limit orders being canceled within 3 seconds after their placement in all markets. Most market activity in terms of the number of contracts represents price-matching limit orders (around 90%), while the remaining 10% is composed by limit orders that either improve or worsen the market and by trades. We evaluate the contribution of these events to price discovery. Results suggest that limit orders that better or worsen the market have major roles in corn, soybean, and wheat market price discovery, while price-matching limit orders play a marginal role. The three types of limit orders jointly contribute more to efficient price variance than trades. Our results suggest that most limit orders in grain futures markets continue to play the traditional role of uninformed liquidity provision, which contrasts with previous research results that point at the market depth in these markets being highly relevant for price discovery.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.