Cognitive-motor interaction during wheelchair propulsion
Frechette, Mikaela Lynn
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/116057
Description
Title
Cognitive-motor interaction during wheelchair propulsion
Author(s)
Frechette, Mikaela Lynn
Issue Date
2022-07-07
Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
Rice, Laura A
Sosnoff, Jacob J
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Rice, Laura A
Committee Member(s)
Hernandez, Manuel Enrique
Petruzzello, Steven J
Department of Study
Kinesiology & Community Health
Discipline
Kinesiology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
attentional demands
dual-task
cognitive-motor interaction
wheelchair propulsion
environmental complexity
Abstract
Cognitive-motor interaction (CMI) research has exclusively investigated ambulatory adults, however, there is reason to believe that individuals who use manual wheelchairs may also be susceptible to this phenomenon. PURPOSE: This investigation seeks to determine: 1) the kinesthetic contributions mediating the attentional demands of wheelchair propulsion, 2) if wheelchair users experience CMI during wheelchair propulsion in a stable environment, and 3) if increased environmental complexity impacts the CMI of wheelchair propulsion. METHODS: Fourteen healthy individuals who use a manual wheelchair (age: 37.8±16.3; sex: 8 males, 6 females) completed a series of single- and dual-task trials. Serial-7 Subtraction was used throughout testing to determine changes in cognitive function. Changes in motor function were determined through the performance of four, 30-second motor tasks: Static Sitting, Short Leans, Maximal Leans, and Stationary Propulsion, and four distinct 35-foot pathways, or Environments, varying in complexity. All dual-tasking trials required the simultaneous completion of Serial-7 Subtraction and a motor task/Environment. Two single- and dual-task trials were completed for each task, and average single and dual-task performance was calculated. Differences in average single- and dual-task performance were determined through paired samples t-tests, and percent changes (i.e., dual-task costs [DTCs]) were calculated to quantify CMI. Within-subjects, repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to determine significant differences between the DTCs of each outcome variable across the four motor tasks and Environments, respectively. IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, version 28, was used to perform all statistical analyses on recorded data with statistical significance set at α=0.05. RESULTS: Single- to dual-task cognitive function was maintained during all motor tasks (DTC≤13%; p=0.12-0.74; d=0.09-0.44) at the expense of impaired motor function during three motor tasks (DTC≤43%; p<0.01-0.03; d=0.67-1.21). Motor function was uniquely maintained during Maximal Leans (DTC≤0.5%; p=0.12-0.93; d=0.02-0.45), which required more cognitive resources than the other tasks, as indicated by significantly lower dual-task cognitive function (p<0.001; ηp2=0.44). Likewise, cognitive function was maintained from the single- to dual-task trial in all Environments (p≥0.16; d≤0.40) and yielded similar DTCs across Environments (p=0.80; ηp2=0.03). Compromised motor function was observed in all Environments (p≤0.03; d≥0.67) and yielded similar DTCs across Environments (p≥0.37, ηp2≥0.04). CONCLUSION: Wheelchair propulsion is attentionally demanding for individuals who use manual wheelchairs. These demands likely stem from the task's seated balance requirements and are stable regardless of environmental complexity. When dual-tasking under these demands, participants most often experienced a decline in motor function to preserve cognitive function, demonstrating a posture-second approach.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.