Analysis of phone-errors in reading disabled children
Wang, Yuechen
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/109148
Description
Title
Analysis of phone-errors in reading disabled children
Author(s)
Wang, Yuechen
Contributor(s)
Allen, Jont
Issue Date
2020-12
Keyword(s)
Reading Disability
Speech Perception
Abstract
Reading disability (RD) is common among children. Negative effects typically persist into the
adulthood. We show that RD children's errors are highly idiosyncratic. Thus, specific treatments
must be made based on their specific errors. In this study we looked deeper than previous
experiments, providing a new approach in analyzing the data. The experiments involved eleven RD
subjects and six reading control (RC) subjects. Two tasks were performed: the Syllable-Confusion
Oddball (SCO) task which can determine which phones cause errors, and the Nonsense Syllable
Confusion Matrix (NSCM) task which provides an error map identifying the phone perception
confusions for each subject. A seventh subject Average Normal (AN) is created in the control group
who has the average performance of the six RC subjects. AN serves as the control subject inside
the RC group, allowing us to identify the general confusion patterns among the normal children, and
to compare the RD and RC groups. We generated a confusion matrix for each subject based on the
NSCM task and calculated the angles between the column vectors for the same sound. The smaller
the angle, the less difference in phone perception confusions between two subjects for one sound.
To find out the confusion patterns of both RC and RD subjects, we clustered the off-diagonal errors
to form confusion groups. We found out that RC subjects and AN subject had a significant overlap
in confusion groups, which strongly suggested that six RC subjects are sufficient to draw the pattern (that of the AN subject) of confusion groups of RC subjects. However, RD subjects had much higher
error rates and nearly random confusion groups compared with the RC subjects. Each RD subject
has unique confusion pairs, and has either much higher error rates, or unique confusions. The
results support the hypothesis that RD subjects are idiosyncratic. Thus, a larger number of subjects
will not reveal distinct patterns, since every subject has unique errors (there are no patterns). We
believe that the confusion groups we found should be helpful in the subsequent treatment of RD
children.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.