The value of action: An examination of when and how actions are evaluated more positively than inactions
Sunderrajan, Aashna
Loading…
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/105053
Description
Title
The value of action: An examination of when and how actions are evaluated more positively than inactions
Author(s)
Sunderrajan, Aashna
Issue Date
2019-04-18
Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
Albarracín, Dolores
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Albarracín, Dolores
Committee Member(s)
Cohen, Dov
Mehta, Ravi
Laurent, Sean
Miller, Andrea
Department of Study
Psychology
Discipline
Psychology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
action
inaction
commission
omission
bias
evaluation
intentionality
Abstract
Human behavior varies along a continuum of activity, with demanding behaviors characterizing actions and restful states characterizing inactions. Action and inaction are integral components of daily life, affecting our decision-making, goal pursuit, self-regulation, well-being, and health. Understanding how people conceptualize and evaluate action and inaction is thus important. The present research found that actions are perceived differently than inactions (Studies 1-2). People not only evaluate actions more favorably than inactions (Study 3) but prefer to engage in actions over inactions as well (Study 4). This phenomenon is driven by a natural tendency to think of actions as more intentional (Study 5), but making intentionality salient does not always reduce the bias favoring action (Study 6). Balancing action and inaction is important for healthy human functioning, underlining the importance of further understanding evaluative biases in this domain.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.