What is common may be as important as what is different: examining the general factor shared by dispositional shame and guilt using bi-factor models

Mu, Wenting

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/101633 Copy

Description

Title

What is common may be as important as what is different: examining the general factor shared by dispositional shame and guilt using bi-factor models

Author(s)

Mu, Wenting

Issue Date

2018-04-17

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Berenbaum, Howard

Doctoral Committee Chair(s)

Berenbaum, Howard

Committee Member(s)

• Roberts, Brent W.
• Drasgow, Fritz
• Cohen, Dov
• Fairbairn, Catharine

Department of Study

Psychology

Discipline

Psychology

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Degree Level

Dissertation

Keyword(s)

shame, guilt, self-conscious emotions, internalizing, externalizing

Abstract

Previous research on shame and guilt has tended to focus on their unique associations with other variables. It has become commonplace to eliminate the substantial shared variance with shame when examining guilt, and to eliminate shared variance with guilt when examining shame. What previous research has typically not done is to examine the variance shared by shame and guilt. In a series of three studies, we addressed this issue by employing bi-factor models to examine the general factor shared by shame and guilt, and its relationship to several important personality traits and two broad liability factors of psychopathology (i.e., externalizing and internalizing psychopathology). As hypothesized, the general factor shared by shame and guilt was strongly and positively associated with personality traits associated with moral emotions (empathy, agreeableness and conscientiousness), and strongly but inversely associated with both self-reported and informant-reported externalizing psychopathology. The general factor was also associated with self-consciousness, but not with self-criticism, vulnerable narcissism or neuroticism. The implications of these findings are discussed regarding the conceptualization of shame and guilt.

Graduation Semester

2018-08

Type of Resource

text

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/101633

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2018 Wenting Mu

Owning Collections