Damnesia: An examination of public participation and evolving approaches to hydropower development in the United States and Brazil

Cecala, Ian E.

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/101044 Copy

Description

Title

Damnesia: An examination of public participation and evolving approaches to hydropower development in the United States and Brazil

Author(s)

Cecala, Ian E.

Issue Date

2018-04-23

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Endres, Bryan

Committee Member(s)

• Lavey, Warren
• Keenan, Patrick

Department of Study

Natural Res & Env Sci

Discipline

Natural Res & Env Sciences

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

M.S.

Degree Level

Thesis

Keyword(s)

• Public participation
• Hydropower
• hydroelectric
• dams
• Environmental law
• Governance
• Environmental Impact Statement
• National Environmental Policy Act
• Endangered Species Act
• Federal Power Act
• Brazil
• Belo Monte
• Indigenous peoples
• Native Americans

Abstract

Large hydropower projects have long been political flashpoints where environmental, economic and social considerations have vied for priority. Historically, economic benefits of large hydropower projects have been assumed to outweigh the costs, a rationale which catalyzed the construction of large hydropower dams around the world with little regard for their socio-environmental externalities. Brazil is still in a semi-developmental stage and accordingly perceives a higher demand for large hydropower projects and infrastructure. While hydropower can bring immense benefits to Brazil’s energy infrastructure, Belo Monte’s location in the Amazon presents serious socio-environmental concerns that are straining Brazil’s legal and regulatory regimes. After a period of explosive growth in dam construction, the United States is now shifting into a period of dam removal and decommission. This is partly due to increased awareness regarding the environmental and social impacts of dams, but made possible by the well-established cadre of statues, regulatory agencies, and advocacy groups with the power to drive meaningful change. The accountability and flexibility built into legal and regulatory frameworks in the United States have enabled the law to adapt and overcome deficiencies in addressing externalities surrounding hydropower development. Public participation has evolved into a key element underlying any policy-based approach to conservation, natural resources management, or application of modern environmental law. The distinction between public participation that is “meaningful” as opposed to public participation that is merely “due” under the law will only become more relevant as the social, environmental and economic externalities imposed by hydropower projects become a larger consideration in regulatory law and policy. Examining this distinction through case studies in the United States and Brazil offers an increasingly relevant perspective on public participation’s role in addressing hydropower externalities.

Graduation Semester

2018-05

Type of Resource

text

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/101044

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2018 Ian Cecala

Owning Collections