Innovations in Reasoning About Health: The Case of the Randomized Controlled Trial [ISSA 2018 Presentation]
Schneider, Jodi; Jackson, Sally
Loading…
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/100341
Description
Title
Innovations in Reasoning About Health: The Case of the Randomized Controlled Trial [ISSA 2018 Presentation]
Author(s)
Schneider, Jodi
Jackson, Sally
Issue Date
2018-07-05
Keyword(s)
Randomized Controlled Trials
Randomized Clinical Trials
argumentation
field dependence
warranting devices
medical reasoning
history of medicine
warrants in argumentation
Abstract
"Field-dependence in argumentation comes about through forms of inference invented by specialized fields. In recent work we introduced the concept of a ""warranting device"": (1) an inference license (2) invented for a specialized argumentative purpose and (3) backed by institutional, procedural, and material assurances of the dependability of conclusions generated by the device. Once established, fields employ such devices across many situations without further defense, even as the devices develop in response to newly-noticed problems.
Many new warranting devices have appeared over the past century to solve problems in reasoning about health and medicine, replacing and obsolescing earlier forms of medical reasoning. One such device is the Randomized Controlled Trial. This case study traces its historical evolution and discusses some current movements toward competing device types."
This is the default collection for all research and scholarship developed by faculty, staff, or students at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.