Oaths and Greed in Tacitus' Histories

Dee, Nicholas M.

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/97297 Copy

Description

Title

Oaths and Greed in Tacitus' Histories

Author(s)

Dee, Nicholas M.

Issue Date

2017-04-11

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Augoustakis, Antony

Doctoral Committee Chair(s)

Augoustakis, Antony

Committee Member(s)

• Manolaraki, Eleni
• Tzanetou, Angeliki
• Walters, Brian
• Williams, Craig

Department of Study

Classics

Discipline

Classical Philology

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Degree Level

Dissertation

Date of Ingest

2017-08-10T19:14:42Z

Keyword(s)

• Tacitus
• Histories
• Roman historiography
• The Year of Four Emperors
• 69 CE
• Flavians
• Oaths
• Roman military

Abstract

In Tacitus’ treatment of the various military conflicts of 69-70 CE, the military oath of allegiance (sacramentum) assumes tremendous significance throughout. The historian pointedly begins his narrative with Galba’s failure to properly compensate his soldiers for their loyalty. This expectation of financial reward for swearing allegiance, a phenomenon which I call the “sacramentum-donativum contract”, arose earlier in the Julio-Claudian period and is still, in Tacitus’ view, the bedrock of the soldier-emperor relationship in 69. Vespasian and his close supporter Mucianus appreciate this contract and understand the vital role the sacramentum ought to play, as the rise of the Flavian challenge in the east demonstrates. Yet, notably, it is instead the brutal and greedy campaign of Antonius Primus that allows for Flavian rule. In Histories 4, after the civil wars have officially ended, Julius Civilis and his fellow rebel Batavians prove adept at administering oaths in order to garner support and subvert loyalties, thereby forcing Roman (and reader) to reckon with the source of Flavian power. The extant text ends with no guarantees that the new regime will ever strike the correct balance between a soldier’s greed and an emperor’s demand for loyalty. In fact, there is every indication that no full reconciliation is on the horizon.

Graduation Semester

2017-05

Type of Resource

text

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97297

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2017 Nicholas Dee

Owning Collections